ACANA vs ProChoice

ACANA and ProChoice are compared using the VetKriter scientific scoring system. ACANA has 210 products with an average VetKriter™ score of 82.1, while ProChoice has 43 products with an average VetKriter™ score of 85.9.

ProChoice leads with a 3.8 point higher average VetKriter™ score.

ACANA

210 Products
82.1
Average VetKriter™
Protein 28.8%
Fat 15.1%
VetKriter™ Min–Max 60.80 – 96.00
VS
Higher Score

ProChoice

43 Products
85.9
Average VetKriter™
Protein 17.9%
Fat 7.2%
VetKriter™ Min–Max 73.80 – 92.00

Your support through these links makes a small but meaningful contribution to keeping VetKriter independent and running. Thank you.

Advertisement · You can buy this product via this link at no extra cost to you; the retailer may pay us a small commission. These links never affect the VetKriter™ score or rankings. Current price and availability are shown on the retailer's page.

Frequently Asked Questions

According to VetKriter analysis, ACANA has an average VetKriter™ score of 82.1 (210 products), while ProChoice has 85.9 (43 products). Individual products should be compared based on your pet's specific needs.

ACANA products average 28.8% crude protein, while ProChoice averages 17.9%. Both values should be evaluated in the context of the overall nutritional profile.

Both ACANA and ProChoice contain products evaluated by VetKriter using AAFCO, FEDIAF, and NRC standards. We recommend consulting your veterinarian to find the most suitable food for your pet.

For kittens and puppies, ProChoice leads: ACANA averages 84.4 VetKriter™ score across 25 formulas, while ProChoice averages 88.9 across 8.

Related Pages

Scientific Analysis by
Doc. Dr. Mehmet COLAK
VetKriter™ · AAFCO / FEDIAF / NRC 2026

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you accept our Cookie Policy.