ACANA vs Hill's Science Plan

ACANA and Hill's Science Plan are compared using the VetKriter scientific scoring system. ACANA has 210 products with an average VetKriter™ score of 82.1, while Hill's Science Plan has 87 products with an average VetKriter™ score of 72.

ACANA leads with a 10.1 point higher average VetKriter™ score.

Higher Score

ACANA

210 Products
82.1
Average VetKriter™
Protein 28.8%
Fat 15.1%
VetKriter™ Min–Max 60.80 – 96.00
VS

Hill's Science Plan

87 Products
72
Average VetKriter™
Protein 24%
Fat 12.6%
VetKriter™ Min–Max 54.60 – 85.00

Your support through these links makes a small but meaningful contribution to keeping VetKriter independent and running. Thank you.

Advertisement · You can buy this product via this link at no extra cost to you; the retailer may pay us a small commission. These links never affect the VetKriter™ score or rankings. Current price and availability are shown on the retailer's page.

Frequently Asked Questions

According to VetKriter analysis, ACANA has an average VetKriter™ score of 82.1 (210 products), while Hill's Science Plan has 72 (87 products). Individual products should be compared based on your pet's specific needs.

ACANA products average 28.8% crude protein, while Hill's Science Plan averages 24%. Both values should be evaluated in the context of the overall nutritional profile.

Both ACANA and Hill's Science Plan contain products evaluated by VetKriter using AAFCO, FEDIAF, and NRC standards. We recommend consulting your veterinarian to find the most suitable food for your pet.

For kittens and puppies, ACANA leads: ACANA averages 84.4 VetKriter™ score across 25 formulas, while Hill's Science Plan averages 77 across 17.

For senior pets, ACANA leads: ACANA averages 80 VetKriter™ score across 6 formulas, while Hill's Science Plan averages 68.5 across 11.

Related Pages

Scientific Analysis by
Doc. Dr. Mehmet COLAK
VetKriter™ · AAFCO / FEDIAF / NRC 2026

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you accept our Cookie Policy.